The Visceral Screen - Between the Cinemas of John Cassavetes and David Cronenberg
Robert FurzeCassavetes demonstrates this through disregard for plot structure and character coherence, while Cronenberg’s focus is on graphic depictions of mutilation, extreme forms of bodily transformation, and violence.
Cassavetes and Cronenberg are established auteurs, but the elements of their films that appear to be barriers to their artistic status, for example, slipshod method and lingering violence or pre-digital special effects, are reassessed here as indicators of creativity. In this way, Furze encourages debates of what makes a film good or bad.
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
Biographical Note
Prologue
Cassavetes, Cronenberg, Barthes: A literature review
Gestation
Visceral
Hidden
The viewer
The chapters to follow: An overview
Chapter 1: The Visceral: From Adjective to Noun
Excess
Legibility
Semiology
Denotation
The visceral
Chapter 2: The Auteur and the Visceral Sense
The place of the author
The out-of-control auteur
The imperfect auteur
The auteur and the visceral sense: John Cassavetes and David Cronenberg
John Cassavetes
David Cronenberg
A few words on cult cinema
Chapter 3: John Cassavetes and David Cronenberg: Lists and Emptiness
Cassavetes, Cronenberg and the DVD special feature
Lists
Emptiness
Semiotics or semiology?
Arbitrariness
Paradigm / syntagm
Chapter 4: Effects
Spectacle
Attractions
Digital
Horrors
Camera Lucida
Theatre
Objects
Videodrome
Faces
Limits
Love Streams
From film to video games
The Path
Digital / analogue
Reaching out, pulling away
Conclusion: The visceral ’Wounds’
Chapeter 5: Cities
Princes and shards: Ideology’s response to the visceral
Eastern Promises
Views from bridges
No centre
Terror
Husbands
Freedom
Division
Conclusion
Appendices
Appendix A: The visceral – a relational model
Appendix B: Cassavantes and Cronenberg – An annotated filmography
A
…